Introduction to the Guidelines for Handling Plagiarism Complaints | 
Printer Friendly |
|
With so much research now available on the Web, and because the highly searchable nature of electronic content has made it easier to detect unacknowledged copying of original text, the number of reported incidents of alleged plagiarism has been growing. The PSPB Operations Manual now provides helpful and detailed guidelines for identifying and handling instances of plagiarism. Section "8.2 Publication Guidelines" of the PSPB Operations Manual contains a major section entitled "Guidelines for Adjudicating Different Levels of Plagiarism." The purpose of this section is to define
IEEE defines plagiarism as the reuse of someone else's prior ideas, processes, results, or words without explicitly acknowledging the original author and source. It is important for all IEEE authors to recognize that plagiarism in any form, at any level, is unacceptable and is considered a serious breach of professional conduct, with potentially severe ethical and legal consequences. Equally important to the process of recognizing an act of plagiarism is clarifying who shall be responsible for responding to any complaints of alleged plagiarism. The new guidelines specify that the person responsible for the IEEE publication (referred to generally as "the editor"), shall be responsible for conducting an investigation and determining if plagiarism has in fact taken place. In order to accomplish this critical task, the editor shall also appoint an independent committee of experts in the topic to help make a recommendation on the allegation. Emphasis is placed on the "independence" of the committee, in that the editor cannot be directly involved with the committee's investigation. Of particular note are the new guidelines for cases involving papers from IEEE conference proceedings. Allegations of misconduct by authors of papers in conference proceedings shall be investigated by the conference publication chair, or by the Publication Officer of the IEEE organizational unit that sponsored the conference if the allegation is made after the publication of the proceedings. Editors must also bring these efforts to the attention of the Vice President of the Publications Services and Products Board, both at the beginning of an investigation and after findings have been reached for final approval. In addition, the guidelines describe procedures for proper referencing of previously published material. Additional information is available at:
For more information, please contact Manager,
IEEE Intellectual Property Rights |
